↓ Skip to main content

Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding brain dysfunction in sepsis
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2110-5820-3-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Romain Sonneville, Franck Verdonk, Camille Rauturier, Isabelle F Klein, Michel Wolff, Djillali Annane, Fabrice Chretien, Tarek Sharshar

Abstract

Sepsis often is characterized by an acute brain dysfunction, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is highly complex, resulting from both inflammatory and noninflammatory processes, which may induce significant alterations in vulnerable areas of the brain. Important mechanisms include excessive microglial activation, impaired cerebral perfusion, blood-brain-barrier dysfunction, and altered neurotransmission. Systemic insults, such as prolonged inflammation, severe hypoxemia, and persistent hyperglycemia also may contribute to aggravate sepsis-induced brain dysfunction or injury. The diagnosis of brain dysfunction in sepsis relies essentially on neurological examination and neurological tests, such as EEG and neuroimaging. A brain MRI should be considered in case of persistent brain dysfunction after control of sepsis and exclusion of major confounding factors. Recent MRI studies suggest that septic shock can be associated with acute cerebrovascular lesions and white matter abnormalities. Currently, the management of brain dysfunction mainly consists of control of sepsis and prevention of all aggravating factors, including metabolic disturbances, drug overdoses, anticholinergic medications, withdrawal syndromes, and Wernicke's encephalopathy. Modulation of microglial activation, prevention of blood-brain-barrier alterations, and use of antioxidants represent relevant therapeutic targets that may impact significantly on neurologic outcomes. In the future, investigations in patients with sepsis should be undertaken to reduce the duration of brain dysfunction and to study the impact of this reduction on important health outcomes, including functional and cognitive status in survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 412 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Researcher 43 10%
Student > Postgraduate 40 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 9%
Other 117 28%
Unknown 88 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 44%
Neuroscience 35 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 103 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,977,850
of 23,724,077 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#474
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,496
of 196,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,724,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.