You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lung lavage for meconium aspiration syndrome in newborn infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003486.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seokyung Hahn, Hyun Jin Choi, Roger Soll, Peter A. Dargaville |
| Abstract |
Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) can occur when a newborn infant inhales a mixture of meconium and amniotic fluid into the lungs around the time of delivery. Other than supportive measures, little effective therapy is available. Lung lavage may be a potentially effective treatment for MAS by virtue of removing meconium from the airspaces and altering the natural course of the disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,446,116
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,017
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,898
of 204,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.