The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,429 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Language trees with sampled ancestors support a hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abg0818 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-220000
|
| Authors |
Paul Heggarty, Cormac Anderson, Matthew Scarborough, Benedict King, Remco Bouckaert, Lechosław Jocz, Martin Joachim Kümmel, Thomas Jügel, Britta Irslinger, Roland Pooth, Henrik Liljegren, Richard F Strand, Geoffrey Haig, Martin Macák, Ronald I Kim, Erik Anonby, Tijmen Pronk, Oleg Belyaev, Tonya Kim Dewey-Findell, Matthew Boutilier, Cassandra Freiberg, Robert Tegethoff, Matilde Serangeli, Nikos Liosis, Krzysztof Stroński, Kim Schulte, Ganesh Kumar Gupta, Wolfgang Haak, Johannes Krause, Quentin D Atkinson, Simon J Greenhill, Denise Kühnert, Russell D Gray |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 66 | 5% |
| Spain | 53 | 4% |
| United States | 41 | 3% |
| Turkey | 14 | <1% |
| Germany | 14 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | <1% |
| France | 9 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 69 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1136 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1249 | 87% |
| Scientists | 141 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1661. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,885
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Science
#367
of 83,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195
of 369,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#9
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.