↓ Skip to main content

Survival Impact of Followup Care after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survival Impact of Followup Care after Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer
Published in
The Journal of Urology, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth A. Strope, Su-Hsin Chang, Ling Chen, Gurdarshan Sandhu, Jay F. Piccirillo, Mario Schootman

Abstract

Due to substantial variation in patient followup after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer, we sought to understand the effect of urine and laboratory tests, physician visits and imaging on overall survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,305,401
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#51
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,464
of 208,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.