↓ Skip to main content

Medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates as potential matrix materials for peripheral nerve regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Regenerative Biomaterials, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 206)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates as potential matrix materials for peripheral nerve regeneration
Published in
Regenerative Biomaterials, July 2023
DOI 10.1093/rb/rbad063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinat Nigmatullin, Caroline S Taylor, Pooja Basnett, Barbara Lukasiewicz, Alexandra Paxinou, Lorena R Lizarraga-Valderrama, John W Haycock, Ipsita Roy

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,059,370
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from Regenerative Biomaterials
#35
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,761
of 214,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regenerative Biomaterials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them