↓ Skip to main content

Computational Assessment of the Cooperativity between RNA Binding Proteins and MicroRNAs in Transcript Decay

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Assessment of the Cooperativity between RNA Binding Proteins and MicroRNAs in Transcript Decay
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Jiang, Mona Singh, Hilary A. Coller

Abstract

Transcript degradation is a widespread and important mechanism for regulating protein abundance. Two major regulators of transcript degradation are RNA Binding Proteins (RBPs) and microRNAs (miRNAs). We computationally explored whether RBPs and miRNAs cooperate to promote transcript decay. We defined five RBP motifs based on the evolutionary conservation of their recognition sites in 3'UTRs as the binding motifs for Pumilio (PUM), U1A, Fox-1, Nova, and UAUUUAU. Recognition sites for some of these RBPs tended to localize at the end of long 3'UTRs. A specific group of miRNA recognition sites were enriched within 50 nts from the RBP recognition sites for PUM and UAUUUAU. The presence of both a PUM recognition site and a recognition site for preferentially co-occurring miRNAs was associated with faster decay of the associated transcripts. For PUM and its co-occurring miRNAs, binding of the RBP to its recognition sites was predicted to release nearby miRNA recognition sites from RNA secondary structures. The mammalian miRNAs that preferentially co-occur with PUM binding sites have recognition seeds that are reverse complements to the PUM recognition motif. Their binding sites have the potential to form hairpin secondary structures with proximal PUM binding sites that would normally limit RISC accessibility, but would be more accessible to miRNAs in response to the binding of PUM. In sum, our computational analyses suggest that a specific set of RBPs and miRNAs work together to affect transcript decay, with the rescue of miRNA recognition sites via RBP binding as one possible mechanism of cooperativity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 31%
Researcher 23 27%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 19%
Computer Science 9 10%
Engineering 5 6%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 7 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,754,178
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,704
of 9,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,410
of 209,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#58
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.