↓ Skip to main content

Probability on Weight Distribution of Bell Peppers and the Computer Simulations for Selection Process in Packaging Apparatus

Overview of attention for article published in Nogyo Shisetsu (Journal of the Society of Agricultural Structures, Japan), September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probability on Weight Distribution of Bell Peppers and the Computer Simulations for Selection Process in Packaging Apparatus
Published in
Nogyo Shisetsu (Journal of the Society of Agricultural Structures, Japan), September 2011
DOI 10.11449/sasj1971.23.1
Authors

Satoshi MURTA, Takahisa MATUOKA, Kiyoshi MIYAUTI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,579,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nogyo Shisetsu (Journal of the Society of Agricultural Structures, Japan)
#6
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,731
of 137,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nogyo Shisetsu (Journal of the Society of Agricultural Structures, Japan)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them