↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Performance of the Micra VR Leadless Pacemaker in a Japanese Cohort ― Comparison With Global Studies ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Performance of the Micra VR Leadless Pacemaker in a Japanese Cohort ― Comparison With Global Studies ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, November 2023
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-23-0269
Authors

Kenji Ando, Kanki Inoue, Tomoo Harada, Satoshi Shizuta, Yukihiko Yoshida, Kengo Kusano, Tatsuya Onuki, Yuji Watari, Akio Fukui, Shingo Sasaki, Morio Shoda, Nobuhiro Nishii, Akira Shiose, Junya Hosoda, Chie Okai, Kurt Stromberg, Jeffrey Murphy, Thomas R Holmes, Kyoko Soejima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,352,037
of 24,862,965 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,125
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,607
of 163,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#19
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.