↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Performance of the Micra VR Leadless Pacemaker in a Japanese Cohort ― Comparison With Global Studies ―

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and Performance of the Micra VR Leadless Pacemaker in a Japanese Cohort ― Comparison With Global Studies ―
Published in
Circulation Journal, August 2023
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-23-0269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Ando, Kanki Inoue, Tomoo Harada, Satoshi Shizuta, Yukihiko Yoshida, Kengo Kusano, Tatsuya Onuki, Yuji Watari, Akio Fukui, Shingo Sasaki, Morio Shoda, Nobuhiro Nishii, Akira Shiose, Junya Hosoda, Chie Okai, Kurt Stromberg, Jeffrey Murphy, Thomas R Holmes, Kyoko Soejima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 100%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,375
of 2,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,599
of 358,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#39
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.