↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the Potential Distribution of Bacillus anthracis under Multiple Climate Change Scenarios for Kazakhstan

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the Potential Distribution of Bacillus anthracis under Multiple Climate Change Scenarios for Kazakhstan
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy Andrew Joyner, Larissa Lukhnova, Yerlan Pazilov, Gulnara Temiralyeva, Martin E. Hugh-Jones, Alim Aikimbayev, Jason K. Blackburn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Uzbekistan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 147 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 32%
Environmental Science 20 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 7%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,059,370
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,900
of 208,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,021
of 96,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#359
of 668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.