↓ Skip to main content

Post-exercise left ventricular dysfunction measured after a long-duration cycling event

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-exercise left ventricular dysfunction measured after a long-duration cycling event
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrique Serrano Ostariz, Marta López Ramón, Daniel Cremades Arroyos, Silvia Izquierdo Álvarez, Pilar Catalán Edo, Cristina Baquer Sahún, Alejandro Legaz Arrese

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this research, an extension to our previous work published in the Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine in 2009, we studied subjects that differed in terms of age and training status and assessed the impact of prolonged exercise on systolic and left ventricular diastolic function and cardiac biomarkers levels, recognized as identifiers of cardiac damage and dysfunction. We also assessed the possible influence of event duration, exercise intensity and weight loss (dehydration) on left ventricular diastolic function. FINDINGS: Ninety-one male cyclists were assessed by echocardiography and serum biomarkers before and after the 2005 Quebrantahuesos cycling event (206 km long and with an accumulated slope of 3800 m). Cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography and cardiac biomarkers were assessed in blood serum. Echocardiograms measured left ventricular internal dimension during diastole and systole, left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole, interventricular septum thickness during diastole, left ventricular ejection fraction and diastolic filling. The heart rate of 50 cyclists was also monitored during the race to evaluate exercise intensity. Echocardiograph results indicated that left ventricular diastolic and systolic function decreased after the race, with systolic function reduced to a significant degree. Left ventricular ejection fraction was below 55% in 29 cyclists. The decrease in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function did not correlate with age, training status, race duration, weight loss or exercise intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function was reduced and cardiac biomarkers were increased after the cycling event, but the mechanisms behind such outcomes remain unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 12 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,009
of 4,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,119
of 195,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#52
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.