↓ Skip to main content

Monosodium Glutamate Intake, Dietary Patterns and Asthma in Chinese Adults

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monosodium Glutamate Intake, Dietary Patterns and Asthma in Chinese Adults
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051567
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zumin Shi, Baojun Yuan, Gary A. Wittert, Xiaoqun Pan, Yue Dai, Robert Adams, Anne W. Taylor

Abstract

Emerging evidence shows that diet is related to asthma. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the association between monosodium glutamate (MSG) intake, overall dietary patterns and asthma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 25%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,511,795
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,643
of 193,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,219
of 278,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#419
of 4,852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.