↓ Skip to main content

Factors affecting antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected women with virologic suppression on combination antiretroviral therapy: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors affecting antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected women with virologic suppression on combination antiretroviral therapy: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-256
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mona Rafik Loutfy, Sharon Lynn Walmsley, Marina Barbara Klein, Janet Raboud, Alice Lin-in Tseng, Sandra Lauren Blitz, Neora Pick, Brian Conway, Jonathan Benjamin Angel, Anita Rochelle Rachlis, Kevin Gough, Jeff Cohen, David Haase, David Burdge, Fiona Mary Smaill, Alexandra de Pokomandy, Hugues Loemba, Sylvie Trottier, Charles Jean la Porte

Abstract

Although some studies show higher antiretroviral concentrations in women compared to men, data are limited. We conducted a cross-sectional study of HIV-positive women to determine if protease inhibitor (PI) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) C(min) and Cmax values were significantly different than historical general population (predominantly male) averages and to evaluate correlates of higher concentrations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 45%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Chemistry 3 10%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,037,496
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,102
of 7,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,559
of 195,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#67
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.