↓ Skip to main content

Conversion ratio between Dysport and Botox in clinical practice: an overview of available evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conversion ratio between Dysport and Botox in clinical practice: an overview of available evidence
Published in
Neurological Sciences, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10072-013-1357-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta Ravenni, Domenico De Grandis, Alberto Mazza

Abstract

The optimal conversion ratio between Dysport and Botox--the two botulinum neurotoxin type A products (BoNT-As) supported by the larger bulk of evidence-has been extensively debated, because of its broad medical and economic implications. The article discusses the available evidence on the conversion ratio between Dysport and Botox in adults affected by spasticity, cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm, with a focus on clinical trials that specifically addressed this issue. In addition, some suggestions on the conversion ratio between Dysport and Xeomin can be extrapolated, since Xeomin has the same efficacy and safety profile as Botox and is exchangeable with Botox with a 1:1 conversion ratio. Taken together, the findings retrieved from this literature research suggest that a conversion ratio of 3:1 (Dysport:Botox)--or even lower--can be considered appropriate for the treatment of the above-mentioned conditions. Higher conversion ratios may lead to an overdosing of Dysport, with a potential increased incidence of adverse events. Therefore, we recommend that physicians using both products consider using a lower conversion factor as a guide, adjusting it upwards as required based on the specific characteristics and response to treatment of each patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 27%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Librarian 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 8 18%