↓ Skip to main content

Sputum Microbiota in Tuberculosis as Revealed by 16S rRNA Pyrosequencing

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sputum Microbiota in Tuberculosis as Revealed by 16S rRNA Pyrosequencing
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0054574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Man Kit Cheung, Wai Yip Lam, Wendy Yin Wan Fung, Patrick Tik Wan Law, Chun Hang Au, Wenyan Nong, Kai Man Kam, Hoi Shan Kwan, Stephen Kwok Wing Tsui

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global threat in the 21st century. Traditional studies of the disease are focused on the single pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Recent studies have revealed associations of some diseases with an imbalance in the microbial community. Characterization of the TB microbiota could allow a better understanding of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 172 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#13,539,941
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#110,342
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,472
of 284,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,521
of 5,017 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,017 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.