↓ Skip to main content

Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental and Resource Economics, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,038)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot
Published in
Environmental and Resource Economics, August 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10640-023-00798-y
Authors

Philip J. Platts, Marije Schaafsma, R. Kerry Turner, Neil D. Burgess, Brendan Fisher, Boniface P. Mbilinyi, Pantaleo K. T. Munishi, Taylor H. Ricketts, Ruth D. Swetnam, Antje Ahrends, Biniam B. Ashagre, Julian Bayliss, Roy E. Gereau, Jonathan M. H. Green, Rhys E. Green, Lena Jeha, Simon L. Lewis, Rob Marchant, Andrew R. Marshall, Sian Morse-Jones, Shadrack Mwakalila, Marco A. Njana, Deo D. Shirima, Simon Willcock, Andrew Balmford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 32%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Unspecified 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 14 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#586,257
of 25,123,616 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#19
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,642
of 344,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.