↓ Skip to main content

Flavonoids for treating venous leg ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flavonoids for treating venous leg ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006477.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Scallon, Sally EM Bell‐Syer, Zoriah Aziz

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers are a major health burden: annually, in the UK alone, they contribute an estimated cost to the NHS of GBP 400 million. Flavonoids are a diverse group of naturally-occurring venotonic compounds that address certain microcirculatory parameters involved in venous leg ulcer pathophysiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 40 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 42 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,246,792
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,359
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,705
of 208,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#200
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.