↓ Skip to main content

Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community interventions for preventing smoking in young people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001291.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Nadina A Labiszewski, Adrian J Esterman, Anne B Chang, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Cigarette smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable death in the world. Decisions to smoke are often made within a broad social context and therefore community interventions using coordinated, multi-component programmes may be effective in influencing the smoking behaviour of young people.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
India 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 298 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 20%
Student > Master 60 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 14%
Unspecified 34 11%
Student > Postgraduate 24 8%
Other 88 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 35%
Social Sciences 58 19%
Unspecified 47 15%
Psychology 37 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 9%
Other 32 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#677,661
of 13,571,692 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,140
of 10,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,554
of 151,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,571,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.