↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological interventions for clozapine-induced hypersalivation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological interventions for clozapine-induced hypersalivation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Syed R, Au K, Cahill C, Duggan L, He Y, Udu V, Xia J, Syed, Rebecca, Au, Katie, Cahill, Caroline, Duggan, Lorna, He, Yanling, Udu, Victor, Xia, Jun

Abstract

Clozapine is widely used for people with schizophrenia. Although agranulocytosis, weight gain, and cardiac problems are serious problems associated with its use, hypersalivation, sometimes of a gross and socially unacceptable quantity, is also common (30-80%).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 23%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Unspecified 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Other 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 52%
Unspecified 14 15%
Psychology 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,695,483
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,514
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,546
of 138,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.