↓ Skip to main content

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12874-023-02008-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Dhiman, Jie Ma, Cathy Qi, Garrett Bullock, Jamie C Sergeant, Richard D Riley, Gary S Collins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Lecturer 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,421,429
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#162
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,376
of 347,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.