↓ Skip to main content

Surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: The etiology matters

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery for severe mitral regurgitation: The etiology matters
Published in
Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, August 2023
DOI 10.1097/jcma.0000000000000977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Lin Tsai, Ching-Wei Lee, Wei-Ming Huang, Hao-Min Cheng, Wen-Chung Yu, Chen-Huan Chen, Shih-Hsien Sung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#17,228,617
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
#321
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,263
of 348,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.