↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing falls in people after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing falls in people after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008728.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geert SAF Verheyden, Vivian Weerdesteyn, Ruth M Pickering, Dorit Kunkel, Sheila Lennon, Alexander CH Geurts, Ann Ashburn

Abstract

Falls are one of the most common medical complications after stroke with a reported incidence of 7% in the first week after stroke onset. Studies investigating falls in the later phase after stroke report an incidence of up to 73% in the first year post-stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 247 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 23%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 55 22%
Unknown 22 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 20%
Neuroscience 14 5%
Engineering 13 5%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 37 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,739,964
of 15,094,232 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,407
of 11,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,447
of 156,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,094,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.