Identifying molecular phenotypes in sepsis: an analysis of two prospective observational cohorts and secondary analysis of two randomised controlled trials
Pratik Sinha, V Eric Kerchberger, Andrew Willmore, Julia Chambers, Hanjing Zhuo, Jason Abbott, Chayse Jones, Nancy Wickersham, Nelson Wu, Lucile Neyton, Charles R Langelier, Eran Mick, June He, Alejandra Jauregui, Matthew M Churpek, Antonio D Gomez, Carolyn M Hendrickson, Kirsten N Kangelaris, Aartik Sarma, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Kevin L Delucchi, Kathleen D Liu, James A Russell, Michael A Matthay, Keith R Walley, Lorraine B Ware, Carolyn S Calfee
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
3%
Other
2
5%
Unknown
20
54%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,476,449
of 26,429,244 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#897
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,951
of 365,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#12
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,429,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
