↓ Skip to main content

Drug therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003002.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mason M, Welsh EJ, Smith I, Mason, Martina, Welsh, Emma J, Smith, Ian

Abstract

The treatment of choice for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) applied via a mask during sleep. However, this is not tolerated by all individuals and its role in mild OSA is not proven. Drug therapy has been proposed as an alternative to CPAP in some patients with mild to moderate sleep apnoea and could be of value in patients intolerant of CPAP. A number of mechanisms have been proposed by which drugs could reduce the severity of OSA. These include an increase in tone in the upper airway dilator muscles, an increase in ventilatory drive, a reduction in the proportion of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, an increase in cholinergic tone during sleep, an increase in arousal threshold, a reduction in airway resistance and a reduction in surface tension in the upper airway.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 164 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Researcher 24 14%
Unspecified 23 13%
Other 14 8%
Other 55 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 54%
Unspecified 32 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 25 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#945,066
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,067
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,508
of 138,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.