↓ Skip to main content

2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
298 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2023 ACR/EULAR antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, August 2023
DOI 10.1136/ard-2023-224609
Pubmed ID
Authors

Medha Barbhaiya, Stephane Zuily, Ray Naden, Alison Hendry, Florian Manneville, Mary-Carmen Amigo, Zahir Amoura, Danieli Andrade, Laura Andreoli, Bahar Artim-Esen, Tatsuya Atsumi, Tadej Avcin, Michael H Belmont, Maria Laura Bertolaccini, D Ware Branch, Graziela Carvalheiras, Alessandro Casini, Ricard Cervera, Hannah Cohen, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau, Mark Crowther, Guilherme de Jesús, Aurelien Delluc, Sheetal Desai, Maria De Sancho, Katrien M Devreese, Reyhan Diz-Kucukkaya, Ali Duarte-García, Camille Frances, David Garcia, Jean-Christophe Gris, Natasha Jordan, Rebecca K Leaf, Nina Kello, Jason S Knight, Carl Laskin, Alfred I Lee, Kimberly Legault, Steve R Levine, Roger A Levy, Maarten Limper, Michael D Lockshin, Karoline Mayer-Pickel, Jack Musial, Pier Luigi Meroni, Giovanni Orsolini, Thomas L Ortel, Vittorio Pengo, Michelle Petri, Guillermo Pons-Estel, Jose A Gomez-Puerta, Quentin Raimboug, Robert Roubey, Giovanni Sanna, Surya V Seshan, Savino Sciascia, Maria G Tektonidou, Angela Tincani, Denis Wahl, Rohan Willis, Cécile Yelnik, Catherine Zuily, Francis Guillemin, Karen Costenbader, Doruk Erkan

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 298 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 11%
Other 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Unspecified 8 6%
Professor 7 5%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 61 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 39%
Unspecified 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 61 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2024.
All research outputs
#159,199
of 26,743,076 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#58
of 7,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,103
of 367,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,743,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.