The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of action of therapeutic exercise for knee and hip OA remain a black box phenomenon: an individual patient data mediation study with the OA Trial Bank
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
RMD Open, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jos Runhaar, Melanie A Holden, Miriam Hattle, Jonathan Quicke, Emma Louise Healey, Danielle van der Windt, Krysia S Dziedzic, Marienke van Middelkoop, Sita Bierma-Zeinstra, Nadine E Foster, The STEER OA Patient Advisory Group, Jenny Brown, Carol Ingram, Sheila Hickson, Robert Taylor, Christine Walker, The OA Trial Bank Exercise Collaborative, J Haxby Abbott, Kelli Allen, Michael Hurley, Kim Bennell, David Bossen, Kanda Chaipinyo, Tom Cochrane, Mariëtte de Rooij, May Arna Risberg, Kelley Fitzgerald, Helen French, Leigh Hale, Marius Henriksen, Rana S Hinman, Marijke Hopman-Rock, Justin Keogh, Cindy Veenhof, Jesper Knoop, Inga Krauß, Pazit Levinger, Christopher McCarthy, Stephen P Messier, Ari Heinonen, Havard Osteras, Shahnawaz Anwer, AnaCristina Rodrigues Lacerda, Ganesh Shankar, Benjamin Steinhilber, Yusuke Suzuki, Michael A Hunt, Laura Talbot, Carolien Teirlinck, Michael Doherty, Pao-Feng Tsai, Jason Wallis, Merve Yilmaz Menek |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 69% |
| Scientists | 17 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 39% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,050,713
of 26,213,016 outputs
Outputs from RMD Open
#66
of 1,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,939
of 362,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RMD Open
#5
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,213,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.