You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health: identification and treatment of wasting in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015311 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleni Papadopoulou, Yen Chian Lim, Weng Yee Chin, Kerry Dwan, Susan Munabi-Babigumira, Simon Lewin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 33% |
| Norway | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,389,609
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,541
of 13,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,714
of 359,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.