↓ Skip to main content

Signaling-Mediated Control of Cell Division

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Role of Cdc6 During Oogenesis and Early Embryo Development in Mouse and Xenopus laevis
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Role of Cdc6 During Oogenesis and Early Embryo Development in Mouse and Xenopus laevis
Chapter number 7
Book title
Signaling-Mediated Control of Cell Division
Published in
Results and problems in cell differentiation, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44820-6_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-944819-0, 978-3-31-944820-6
Authors

Borsuk, Ewa, Jachowicz, Joanna, Kloc, Malgorzata, Tassan, Jean-Pierre, Kubiak, Jacek Z., Ewa Borsuk, Joanna Jachowicz, Malgorzata Kloc, Jean-Pierre Tassan, Jacek Z. Kubiak

Abstract

Cdc6 is an important player in cell cycle regulation. It is involved in the regulation of both S-phase and M-phase. Its role during oogenesis is crucial for repression of the S-phase between the first and the second meiotic M-phases, and it also regulates, via CDK1 inhibition, the M-phase entry and exit. This is of special importance for the reactivation of the major M-phase-regulating kinase CDK1 (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1) in oocytes entering metaphase II of meiosis and in embryo cleavage divisions, in which precise timing allows coordination between cell cycle events and developmental program of the embryo. In this chapter, we discuss the role of Cdc6 protein in oocytes and early embryos.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,408,464
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#163
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,148
of 311,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Results and problems in cell differentiation
#18
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.