You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Constraint and Contingency in Multifunctional Gene Regulatory Circuits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua L. Payne, Andreas Wagner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Ireland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 29% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,341,564
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,895
of 9,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,930
of 214,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#28
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.