↓ Skip to main content

Screening for breast cancer with mammography

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 11,948)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
603 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for breast cancer with mammography
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001877.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter C Gøtzsche, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen

Abstract

A variety of estimates of the benefits and harms of mammographic screening for breast cancer have been published and national policies vary.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 787 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 1083 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 172 16%
Student > Master 143 13%
Researcher 84 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 68 6%
Other 174 16%
Unknown 382 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 358 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 76 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 2%
Other 158 14%
Unknown 417 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 855. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#12,697
of 19,204,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 11,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56
of 169,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,204,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.