↓ Skip to main content

Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells Are Enriched in Xenogeneic Tumors Following Chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
67 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
506 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells Are Enriched in Xenogeneic Tumors Following Chemotherapy
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott J. Dylla, Lucia Beviglia, In-Kyung Park, Cecile Chartier, Janak Raval, Lucy Ngan, Kellie Pickell, Jorge Aguilar, Sasha Lazetic, Stephanie Smith-Berdan, Michael F. Clarke, Tim Hoey, John Lewicki, Austin L. Gurney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
France 4 2%
Spain 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 205 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Researcher 47 21%
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 27 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,610,214
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#44,740
of 195,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,297
of 82,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#140
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.