The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
AAPM Medical physics practice guideline 15.A: Peer review in clinical physics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/acm2.14151 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per H. Halvorsen, Alan H. Baydush, Courtney R. Buckey, Navneeth Hariharan, Mary A. Keenan, Jeffrey P. Limmer, Kate E. Lofton, Robin A. Miller, Jeffrey M. Moirano, Joseph Och, Douglas E. Pfeiffer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 7% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Other | 2 | 25% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,625,813
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#64
of 2,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,532
of 350,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.