Are false positives in suicide classification models a risk group? Evidence for “true alarms” in a population-representative longitudinal study of Norwegian adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 18 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 9 X posts from 5 X users, with an upper bound of 56,526 followers.

Does this mean we should consider calling these "false" results something else - like early warning signs?

03 Oct 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @Haghish: My last 2 papers show that in #machinelearning models of #suicide #classification, misclassified #False #Positives persons are…

18 Sep 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

My last 2 papers show that in #machinelearning models of #suicide #classification, misclassified #False #Positives persons are in fact a relevant group for #prevention. Read the papers to learn why is that so! Paper 1: https://t.co/U760f3jXdy Paper 2: h

18 Sep 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

New Research: Are false positives in suicide classification models a risk group? Evidence for “true alarms” in a population-representative longitudinal study of Norwegian adolescents #Psychology #Psych https://t.co/QhDgJTaKhL

17 Sep 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 5 additional X posts.