The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,957 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vaccination after developing long COVID: Impact on clinical presentation, viral persistence, and immune responses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.09.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maryam Nayyerabadi, Lyvia Fourcade, Swarali A Joshi, Prabha Chandrasekaran, Arpita Chakravarti, Chantal Massé, Marie-Lorna Paul, Joanie Houle, Amina M Boubekeur, Charlotte DuSablon, Valérie Boudreau, Danijela Bovan, Emma Darbinian, Emilia Aïsha Coleman, Sandra Vinci, Jean-Pierre Routy, Pierre-Olivier Hétu, Johanne Poudrier, Emilia Liana Falcone |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 199 | 7% |
| United States | 64 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Comoros | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 23 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2639 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2828 | 96% |
| Scientists | 60 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1559. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#7,743
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#17
of 5,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206
of 362,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Infectious Diseases
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.