↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: methodological approaches to understanding mechanisms and ‘what if’ questions in occupational health research

Overview of attention for article published in Occupational and environmental medicine, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: methodological approaches to understanding mechanisms and ‘what if’ questions in occupational health research
Published in
Occupational and environmental medicine, August 2023
DOI 10.1136/oemed-2023-109085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter M Smith

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,244,171
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Occupational and environmental medicine
#275
of 4,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,402
of 365,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Occupational and environmental medicine
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.