You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Earth Ovens (Píib) in the Maya Lowlands: Ethnobotanical Data Supporting Early Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12231-012-9207-2 |
| Authors |
Carmen Salazar, Daniel Zizumbo-Villarreal, Stephen B. Brush, Patricia Colunga-GarcíaMarín |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 90% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,609,151
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#41
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,344
of 166,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.