↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000247.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Kenealy, Bruce Arroll

Abstract

It has long been believed that antibiotics have no role in the treatment of common colds yet they are often prescribed in the belief that they may prevent secondary bacterial infections.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 260 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Other 25 9%
Other 76 28%
Unknown 32 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 44 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#90,907
of 15,392,484 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#178
of 11,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#787
of 157,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,392,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.