↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000247.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Kenealy, Bruce Arroll

Abstract

It has long been believed that antibiotics have no role in the treatment of common colds yet they are often prescribed in the belief that they may prevent secondary bacterial infections.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 414 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 14%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Researcher 33 8%
Other 32 8%
Other 89 21%
Unknown 118 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 5%
Psychology 10 2%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 134 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2024.
All research outputs
#218,342
of 26,741,834 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#353
of 13,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,340
of 212,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,741,834 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.