↓ Skip to main content

High Rates of Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Tonsillar Tissues from Children with Chronic Adenotonsillar Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High Rates of Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Tonsillar Tissues from Children with Chronic Adenotonsillar Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0042136
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Luiz Proenca-Modena, Fabiana Cardoso Pereira Valera, Marcos Gerhardinger Jacob, Guilherme Pietrucci Buzatto, Tamara Honorato Saturno, Lucia Lopes, Jamila Mendonça Souza, Flavia Escremim Paula, Maria Lucia Silva, Lucas Rodrigues Carenzi, Edwin Tamashiro, Eurico Arruda, Wilma Terezinha Anselmo-Lima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#185,712
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,887
of 182,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,221
of 4,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.