↓ Skip to main content

Alternative ways of using field‐based estimates to calibrate ecosystem models and their implications for carbon cycle studies

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alternative ways of using field‐based estimates to calibrate ecosystem models and their implications for carbon cycle studies
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/jgrg.20080
Authors

Yujie He, Qianlai Zhuang, A. David McGuire, Yaling Liu, Min Chen

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 14%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 35 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 20 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2013.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#1,610
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,691
of 206,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#14
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.