You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Sex differences in adverse events following seasonal influenza vaccines: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978), September 2023
Marilou Kiely, Fazia Tadount, Ernest Lo, Manish Sadarangani, Shu Qin Wei, Ellen Rafferty, Caroline Quach, Shannon E MacDonald
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||11||73%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||20%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||7%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||2||29%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||14%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||14%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,887,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
of 4,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 333,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1978)
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,887,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.