The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Where is Athena?—The dominant male voice on the future of nursing in published editorial debates
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.1111/jocn.16889 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mary Ryder, Michael Connolly, Eileen Furlong, Brian Magennis, John S. G. Wells, Fiona Timmins |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 13 | 28% |
Ireland | 11 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 21 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 49% |
Scientists | 15 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,335,417
of 26,552,644 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#233
of 5,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,336
of 366,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,552,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.