You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Animal hoarding: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.47626/1516-4446-2022-3003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bárbara Perdigão Stumpf, Bárbara Calácio, Beatriz Castello Branco, Bruno Wilnes, Graziella Soier, Lívia Soares, Lucas Diamante, Carolina Cappi, Monicke O. Lima, Fábio Lopes Rocha, Leonardo F. Fontenelle, Izabela Guimarães Barbosa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,963,905
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#160
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,539
of 481,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.