You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Traditional Herbal Medicine Use Associated with Liver Fibrosis in Rural Rakai, Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041737 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Brandon J. Auerbach, Steven J. Reynolds, Mohammed Lamorde, Concepta Merry, Collins Kukunda-Byobona, Ponsiano Ocama, Aggrey S. Semeere, Anthony Ndyanabo, Iga Boaz, Valerian Kiggundu, Fred Nalugoda, Ron H. Gray, Maria J. Wawer, David L. Thomas, Gregory D. Kirk, Thomas C. Quinn, Lara Stabinski, Rakai Health Sciences Program |
Abstract |
Traditional herbal medicines are commonly used in sub-Saharan Africa and some herbs are known to be hepatotoxic. However little is known about the effect of herbal medicines on liver disease in sub-Saharan Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 36% |
India | 2 | 18% |
Denmark | 1 | 9% |
South Africa | 1 | 9% |
Uganda | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 174 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 19% |
Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
Researcher | 14 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 18% |
Unknown | 46 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 28 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
Other | 28 | 16% |
Unknown | 51 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,082,375
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,931
of 193,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,086
of 277,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#960
of 4,739 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,739 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.