↓ Skip to main content

Reasons to Be Skeptical about Sentience and Pain in Fishes and Aquatic Invertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fisheries Science, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 249)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reasons to Be Skeptical about Sentience and Pain in Fishes and Aquatic Invertebrates
Published in
Reviews in Fisheries Science, October 2023
DOI 10.1080/23308249.2023.2257802
Authors

Benjamin K. Diggles, Robert Arlinghaus, Howard I. Browman, Steven J. Cooke, Robin L. Cooper, Ian G. Cowx, Charles D. Derby, Stuart W. Derbyshire, Paul JB Hart, Brian Jones, Alexander O. Kasumyan, Brian Key, Julian G. Pepperell, D Christopher Rogers, James D. Rose, Alex Schwab, Anne B. Skiftesvik, Don Stevens, Jeffrey D. Shields, Craig Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 10%
Unspecified 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,479,312
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fisheries Science
#21
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,407
of 361,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fisheries Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them