↓ Skip to main content

Economic Development and Forest Cover: Evidence from Satellite Data

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
63 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic Development and Forest Cover: Evidence from Satellite Data
Published in
Scientific Reports, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep40678
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Crespo Cuaresma, Olha Danylo, Steffen Fritz, Ian McCallum, Michael Obersteiner, Linda See, Brian Walsh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Master 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Other 22 8%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 81 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 50 18%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 42 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 98 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#275,520
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,191
of 143,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,808
of 424,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#80
of 3,719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.