↓ Skip to main content

Access to Primary Care and Visits to Emergency Departments in England: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
73 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Access to Primary Care and Visits to Emergency Departments in England: A Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas E. Cowling, Elizabeth V. Cecil, Michael A. Soljak, John Tayu Lee, Christopher Millett, Azeem Majeed, Robert M. Wachter, Matthew J. Harris

Abstract

The number of visits to hospital emergency departments (EDs) in England has increased by 20% since 2007-08, placing unsustainable pressure on the National Health Service (NHS). Some patients attend EDs because they are unable to access primary care services. This study examined the association between access to primary care and ED visits in England. A cross-sectional, population-based analysis of patients registered with 7,856 general practices in England was conducted, for the time period April 2010 to March 2011. The outcome measure was the number of self-referred discharged ED visits by the registered population of a general practice. The predictor variables were measures of patient-reported access to general practice services; these were entered into a negative binomial regression model with variables to control for the characteristics of patient populations, supply of general practitioners and travel times to health services. MAIN RESULT AND CONCLUSION: General practices providing more timely access to primary care had fewer self-referred discharged ED visits per registered patient (for the most accessible quintile of practices, RR = 0.898; P<0.001). Policy makers should consider improving timely access to primary care when developing plans to reduce ED utilisation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 164 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Master 27 16%
Other 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Engineering 4 2%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#590,124
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,981
of 225,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,201
of 210,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#199
of 4,633 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,633 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.