The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
System dynamics simulation for evaluating implementation strategies of genomic sequencing: tutorial and conceptual model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14737167.2023.2267764 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hadi A. Khorshidi, Deborah Marshall, Ilias Goranitis, Brock Schroeder, Maarten IJzerman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,139,216
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
#56
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,669
of 366,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.