↓ Skip to main content

The Population Decline and Extinction of Darwin’s Frogs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
36 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Population Decline and Extinction of Darwin’s Frogs
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudio Soto-Azat, Andrés Valenzuela-Sánchez, Ben Collen, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Alberto Veloso, Andrew A. Cunningham

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 133 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 21%
Student > Master 27 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 17 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 58%
Environmental Science 27 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 19 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#415,104
of 24,034,335 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,925
of 206,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,919
of 200,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#158
of 4,618 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,034,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,618 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.