You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: analysis of previously proposed risk factors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinics, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1807-59322010000200002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ali Harlak, Oner Mentes, Selim Kilic, Kagan Coskun, Kazim Duman, Fahri Yilmaz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 28% |
Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#667
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,127
of 172,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#34
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.