You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/ard-2023-224762 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonis Fanouriakis, Myrto Kostopoulou, Jeanette Andersen, Martin Aringer, Laurent Arnaud, Sang-Cheol Bae, John Boletis, Ian N Bruce, Ricard Cervera, Andrea Doria, Thomas Dörner, Richard A Furie, Dafna D Gladman, Frederic A Houssiau, Luís Sousa Inês, David Jayne, Marios Kouloumas, László Kovács, Chi Chiu Mok, Eric F Morand, Gabriella Moroni, Marta Mosca, Johanna Mucke, Chetan B Mukhtyar, György Nagy, Sandra Navarra, Ioannis Parodis, José M Pego-Reigosa, Michelle Petri, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Matthias Schneider, Josef S Smolen, Elisabet Svenungsson, Yoshiya Tanaka, Maria G Tektonidou, YK Onno Teng, Angela Tincani, Edward M Vital, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Chris Wincup, George Bertsias, Dimitrios T Boumpas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 910 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 70 | 8% |
| Mexico | 61 | 7% |
| Colombia | 35 | 4% |
| United States | 33 | 4% |
| India | 28 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 23 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 3% |
| France | 23 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 16 | 2% |
| Other | 181 | 20% |
| Unknown | 417 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 731 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 101 | 11% |
| Scientists | 67 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 241 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 117 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Unknown | 122 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 728. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#28,433
of 25,888,065 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#9
of 7,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#565
of 361,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.