↓ Skip to main content

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 7,913)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
914 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2023
DOI 10.1136/ard-2023-224762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonis Fanouriakis, Myrto Kostopoulou, Jeanette Andersen, Martin Aringer, Laurent Arnaud, Sang-Cheol Bae, John Boletis, Ian N Bruce, Ricard Cervera, Andrea Doria, Thomas Dörner, Richard A Furie, Dafna D Gladman, Frederic A Houssiau, Luís Sousa Inês, David Jayne, Marios Kouloumas, László Kovács, Chi Chiu Mok, Eric F Morand, Gabriella Moroni, Marta Mosca, Johanna Mucke, Chetan B Mukhtyar, György Nagy, Sandra Navarra, Ioannis Parodis, José M Pego-Reigosa, Michelle Petri, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Matthias Schneider, Josef S Smolen, Elisabet Svenungsson, Yoshiya Tanaka, Maria G Tektonidou, YK Onno Teng, Angela Tincani, Edward M Vital, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Chris Wincup, George Bertsias, Dimitrios T Boumpas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 914 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 315 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Other 22 7%
Student > Master 17 5%
Researcher 16 5%
Unspecified 15 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 168 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 28%
Unspecified 16 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 174 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 741. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#28,558
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#9
of 7,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#562
of 367,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.