↓ Skip to main content

EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 7,773)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
898 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus: 2023 update
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2023
DOI 10.1136/ard-2023-224762
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonis Fanouriakis, Myrto Kostopoulou, Jeanette Andersen, Martin Aringer, Laurent Arnaud, Sang-Cheol Bae, John Boletis, Ian N Bruce, Ricard Cervera, Andrea Doria, Thomas Dörner, Richard A Furie, Dafna D Gladman, Frederic A Houssiau, Luís Sousa Inês, David Jayne, Marios Kouloumas, László Kovács, Chi Chiu Mok, Eric F Morand, Gabriella Moroni, Marta Mosca, Johanna Mucke, Chetan B Mukhtyar, György Nagy, Sandra Navarra, Ioannis Parodis, José M Pego-Reigosa, Michelle Petri, Bernardo A Pons-Estel, Matthias Schneider, Josef S Smolen, Elisabet Svenungsson, Yoshiya Tanaka, Maria G Tektonidou, YK Onno Teng, Angela Tincani, Edward M Vital, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Chris Wincup, George Bertsias, Dimitrios T Boumpas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 898 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 43 25%
Other 18 11%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 34%
Unspecified 45 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 722. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#28,002
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#9
of 7,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#556
of 354,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.