You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Declining Rates in Male Circumcision amidst Increasing Evidence of its Public Health Benefit
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2007
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000861 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zohar Mor, Charlotte K. Kent, Robert P. Kohn, Jeffrey D. Klausner |
Abstract |
Recent experimental evidence has demonstrated the benefits of male circumcision for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Studies have also shown that male circumcision is cost-effective and reduces the risk for certain ulcerative sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). The epidemiology of male circumcision in the United States is poorly studied and most prior reports were limited by self-reported measures. The study objective was to describe male circumcision trends among men attending the San Francisco municipal STD clinic, and to correlate the findings with HIV, syphilis and sexual orientation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 25% |
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 35% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,312,203
of 25,349,035 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,698
of 219,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,878
of 77,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#94
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.